We decided to study bridges to learn principles of forces, bridge design, and bridge types and also to help the children develop interpersonal skills. We broke the class into groups and had them work together to develop a final project. One challenge was in talking about bridges in ways that the students could understand.
Architect: Curt BiehnObjective:To introduce the study of bridges to the students, including principles of forces and bridge design, as well as the different kinds of bridges.
Activity: Comments:
It was difficult for students to
understand the concepts of force and structure, so we demonstrated them.
The first demonstration dealt with truss design and how trusses work. The
second involved three students acting as components of a suspension
bridge. Both were extremely successful.
Objective:To introduce what an architect does as a professional. We also planned to reinforce the concepts of structure and forces introduced during the first session.
Activity:Comments:
The video was a
great way of reinforcing the topic of bridge design and forces, which had
been covered in the first week.

Objective:Set up groups of six children and have them work together to figure out what type of bridge to build.
Comments:
We grouped the children into three
groups of six. Each group began talking about their ideas of what type of
bridge to design. The children drew their ideas on paper and attempted to
figure out who was going to do what. The groups picked a truss bridge, a
suspension bridge and an arch bridge.
Objective:Children begin to design their bridges while working in a team.
Activity:Comments:
To help the truss
bridge group, we had to teach them how each individual stuctural member
was joined. The arch bridge group discovered they needed to build an arch
form out of cardboard. We helped the suspension bridge group figure out
the stages of the construction process and what should be built in what
order. The children had to keep going back to figure out what was wrong
with the bridge. Although they were sometimes frustrated with the
construction process, they were excited when they completed it.

Objective:Continue working together on the design and construction of bridge projects.
Comments:
There were fewer questions on how
to build things than before and the projects were developing at a much
faster rate. Several children began to show excitement when they came up
with the answer to questions that eluded them the week before. The
children were working much better together in the groups than in previous
weeks.
Objective:Each group completes bridge construction and presents their project to the class, working on presentation skills.
Activity:Comments:
The students
worked at a frantic pace during the first half of the class to finish
their projects. During the second half of the class we asked them to
present their projects to the class by describing what type of bridge they
had made and what components made the structure work. This was an
opportunity to see what they recalled from the previous weeks, and they
did not let us down.
Objective:Take a field trip to an actual bridge to reinforce the lessons of the previous weeks.
Activity:Comments:
We walked to the midspan of the bridge pointing out
structural elements, such as cables and piers. After walking over the
bridge, we went underneath to see more structural elements, such as
trusses, pinned connections, and foundation.
After the students had struggled with their understanding of bridge construction this field trip brought real insight to the immensity of a bridge. The field trip tied up loose ends and clarified question the students had been pondering throughout the program. It was a wonderful experience.
| Conference Room |
|
|
|
Send your comments and feedback to AIEphiladelphia@aol.com. Architecture in Education is a program of the AIA Philadelphia Chapter This site was made possible through the generous support of WHYY and The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and the National Endowment for the Arts. © Copyright 1996-99 |